|
July 7, 2004 |
|
There is a lot to report in this
update. Perhaps I should have made this section into a two part series, but
I did not want to interrupt my progress. Needless to say I have been very
busy. I have made a major decision of what the bike (at least the first
version) will be. I initially reported that this will be a transport
version, to be used for trips primarily. And to support this goal
design-wise it will be a dual 20 inch (406mm) wheel and with rear
suspension. My present bike, the Baron Clone (BC) is a 406 front with a 650
rear and no suspension. This has been the fastest road configuration that I
have found, at least in my area and for my type of riding. Because I am so
impressed with the construction method of the X-Port bike and my general
progress, I have decided to clone the clone, at least for the first
version. X-Port number 1 will be a transport version of the BC using 650
rear wheel and a 406 front wheel with no suspension. All other factors
remain the same, those factors being the split frame and the front wheel
drive (FWD). The bike will still be able to be put in a case, except for
the rear wheel (650), which must be carried separately, perhaps in my wife’s
suitcase which has way too much stuff anyway. In essence it will be an
upgrade to my BC because I can see advantages to this design and
construction. In the future I will add version 2 which will be a 20 inch
rear wheel (406) which can be totally put in a single case. To accommodate
this design change, the seat will be dismountable so that it can be used in
version 2. There are many PICS in this update and I hope there are no
problems in downloads. |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
From the last
update, the two halves were bonded together. Two layers of narrow carbon
strips were laid at the joint line. The bond between the two halves was
also fortified by epoxy at the balsa blocks. The main frame was then sanded
and holes drilled for the various penetrations. In the first PIC starting
from left to right, the first is for the bottom bracket, then the support
for the front wheel drive idler, then the front seat support. The remaining
two are for attaching the two frame halves together. Also see detail of the
penetrations. In the critical areas, the carbon build-up is approximately
.110-.120 inches. The nominal thickness throughout is .075 inches. The
carbon density appears well permeated and compact which means that I removed
most of the excess resin. This main frame is far stiffer than my present
BC. |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
The first PIC
shows the carbon tubes which was purchased from Maclean Quality Composites.
The larger tube is 1.622 inches OD and the others are 1.400 and 1.300. All
are heavy wall of approximately .062 inches. These will be used for the
penetrations in way of the balsa blocks. I have developed a way to insure
epoxy saturation when inserting the tubes through the balsa. I coat the
balsa with thickened epoxy and a lighter coat on the tube using a stiff
small epoxy brush. The hole is just slightly larger than the tube. Then I
use a screwing action on the tube, at the same time forcing more epoxy (by
the brush bristles) longitudinally around it and in the direction of
insertion. When the tube is fully through the hole, you can see complete
saturation on the other end. The next two PICS show examples of this
method. The first is the tube in the headset area to be used for the front
wheel drive idler, and the second PIC shows the tube through the rear wheel
stays. The last PIC shows the main frame on my fixture with the tubes
installed and the frame given a light coat of clear. The green tape just
prevents paint from coating the opening of the tube because close fitting
items will be installed. More on this later! |
 |
 |
 |
|
Now I must
start building the rear stays. Shown in the first two PICS is the BC on the
fixture. Critical dimensions are taken so that they can be transferred to
the new frame. This will insure an exact copy of geometry. Also see a PIC
of the Rotor Cranks. The left pedal is in the dead spot and the right one
is advanced past the corresponding dead zone. |
 |
 |
 |
|
Shown here is
the new X-Port main frame in the fixture and a rough plywood piece to mock
up a single rear stay. From this mockup a set of identical rear stays will
be copied. |
 |
 |
|
These PICS
show the same setup, but the seat has been placed on the bike to show what
the complete assembly will look like. Note that the seat is, at this time,
not at the correct angle. It is only for visual purposed. |
 |
|
Shown here was
my original intent for a portion of the rear stays. I made a sandwich core,
what I call the spine, of carbon and Nomex. The carbon is two
unidirectional layers (90 degrees to each other) of .016 inch material.
Therefore each side is approximately .030 inch. My original thinking was
for the core to be Nomex. I changed my mind with the Nomex because I liked
the bonding chacteristics of balsa with cross tubes. So I decided to use
the carbon with ¼ inch balsa as the core. To this spine I must add the rear
dropouts, as well as the front section which will be attached to the main
frame. The latter is very important because that is where the frame will
come apart for transportation. |
 |
|
Shown here is
the plywood pattern with some of my choices for construction. The large
plate on the left is a piece of .110 X 8 X 116 inch. This was purchased from
Aerospace Composite Products. It is a high pressure cross pattern multi
layer corelite construction. Extremely light and super stiff, and a price
tag to match! This will be used for the rear dropouts as well as the
connection to the main frame. I attempted to copy this in the piece shown
on the right, built up to the same thickness. Not only was mine heavier (by
a bunch) but was not as stiff. It has to do with their construction
process. I am confident the home builder cannot match the bonding pressure
that is used in this process. Needless to say I did not use my piece. Next
is the sheet of 90 degrees carbon previously mentioned? This is shown lying
on the table. |
 |
 |
 |
|
The first PIC
shows the rear dropouts doubled up. The second shows the result after many
hours of drilling (not an easy task with this material) and sanding. The
resulting weight of the rear dropouts is now about 30 grams (for both) or
just over an ounce. |
 |
|
This is the
beginning of the rear stay spine construction. On the right is the
pattern. On the left is one side and in the middle is the other. On the
left one you can see the dropout on top, the corelite material towards the
bottom, the balsa material in the center, and the 90 degree carbon is
obviously behind the assembly and tying all together. The middle one is the
same but you can see the thin carbon and the balsa is hidden. |
 |
 |
|
The first PIC
shows the spine after the remaining side has been covered with the .030 inch
90 degree carbon cover. Some sanding of surface and edges has been done at
this time. The second PIC shows lightning holes drilled in each spine.
Some major cross tubes will be bonded (shown clearer later) through and care
was taken not to drill the spine in that area. |
 |
 |
 |
|
These 3 PICS
show the rear stays after they have been covered with a layer of balsa. A ¼
inch thick piece was put on the outboard side and a 3/32 piece on the
inboard. It was then sanded, shaped and hit with a primer to show surface
imperfections. The surface must be smooth here because two layers of carbon
cloth will be wrapped around the assembly. |
 |
 |
|
I took a break
from the rear stays construction to modify the front seat attachment. At
the heart of this design is for the seat to be apart of the frame strength.
I will go into more detail later. This necessitates that the attachment
points be as rigid as possible. In the first PIC is shown a stock Optima
front seat mount in aluminum. Being the anal weight weenie that I am I
drilled and milled off material from the top. I did this to save weight
primarily. The unit will be bonded to the seat so excess aluminum was is
not necessary. The final mount is shown in the second PIC. |
 |
 |
|
Getting back
to the rear stays. They are both covered with 2 layers of cloth and
sanded. The first PIC shows them individually and the second on the main
frame. Work is not finished yet, however! |
 |
|
Shown is the
front seat bracket attached to the main frame. |
 |
|
This is the
final step in the individual rear stay construction before assembly. Holes
are drilled for the following reasons. The two holes on the right are for
the connecting pins which attach main and rear frame. The third hole (from
the right) is for a major cross tube connecting stays. The fourth hole is
for lightning and the last is for the major cross tube. The brakes as well
as the rear seat mount will be connected here. |
 |
 |
 |
|
The connection
point of the rear to the main must be rock solid in order for this design to
work. That means that there must be metal to metal connection and on a flat
surface so that the rear and front is not allowed to rotate or move. I made
inserts for the main frame and the rear. This is shown in the first PIC.
The second shows a little more detail and the two pieces for the front seat
mount. I choose to make that from an epoxy/filler compound because I wanted
to lighten up and this was adequate for the purpose. Whenever I have excess
epoxy left over from an application I pour it into a cup, put in some filler
and perhaps a pigment (which is shown in the last PIC) and allowed to cure.
I then machine that down for bushings or whatever when ever I don’t want the
weight of aluminum. The result is rock hard, light and bonds extremely well
to carbon. |
 |
 |
 |
|
The unit is
tied together! The rear dropout distance is set at 100 mm for a standard
front wheel. Again remember this is a FWD so the front is installed on the
rear. The main cross tubes are bonded in place and the metal inserts are
bonded on the inside of the connecting arms. |
 |
 |
 |
|
I must now
present my design objective that will make the unit work as an integrated
unit……or so I truly hope! My design goal is to be as stiff a frame as my
VK-2, built by Velokraft. Kamil’s design works the way it does because of
not only the front stiffness (boom) but also the rear. He achieves this by
integrating the inherent torsional strength of the seat into the frame.
While my BC has adequate boom stiffness, the rear is lacking. This design
copies from Kamil’s in that the front is as deep and wide (the balsa blocks
also add a great deal) but the rear seat will be a strength member as well.
Looking at the first PIC I have rigidly attached a carbon clad balsa block
and bonded it to the rear frame stays which are tied together by the 1.622 X
.061 inch carbon tube. There is a quote somewhere in the Bible that says
“What God has but together, let no man put asunder.” I don’t even think God
can put this asunder! I put aluminum pins through the block and threaded it
for 6 mm bolts, which I use to attach the seat. I then strengthened the
underside of the seat to help transfer torsion to the seat channels on both
sides. The front bracket is also shown and was reinforced in the same
manner. I will keep all appraised as to the successful results of my
theory……or lack thereof (successful results)! |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
The two parts
are joined here! These PICS show form fit and function without the seat
installed. |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
The bike
completely together with all major components! As can be seen relative to a
person (my webmaster/daughter in this case) this is not a small wheelbase
compact frame. This is a full size bike and the wheelbase will be somewhat
over 50 inches. No compromise was made to make it other than a real low
rider. When I am finished, I probably will have to reduce the boom by
approximately 1-1 ½ inch to accommodate my leg size. I plan to permanently
bond it without it being adjustable. The same non-adjustability goes for
the seat angle. It is what it is and I will live with it.
Now for
weight! My goal was to get as close to Kamil’s VK-2 weight as possible,
which was 2500 grams (5.51 pounds). The weight at this time is 2850 grams
(6.28 pounds). I overbuilt the front main frame, and I have no regrets.
This bike will be much stiffer than my BC, and time will tell if it compares
to the VK-2. As a relative comparison, it was a long time ago but I recall
the weight of the original aluminum Optima Baron with seat (it had very
heavy stainless steel seat mounts) was in the vicinity of 11 pounds. The
weight of the M5 CLR, frame only with integrated seat was approximately 9 ½
pounds. The weight of my BC was at least 8 ½ pounds and the main reason I
lost control is because I had it professionally painted at a body shop. The
present bike will not be painted. I have put a few very light clear coats,
and I may add another coat, but that is it. The finish, while showing a few
pinholes is good enough for show purposes. I am sure the final weight when
I add the pins to attach front and rear half will front seat bolt will be
close to 6 ½ pounds, which is about 18 % greater than the VK -2, but I am
still on target to get a final all up weight of low 20 pound range barring
FWD stuff getting out of control. |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
A few last
PICS of the frame parts! Shown in the first 3 are of the individual main
frame halves. The last 2 are meant to show a possible storage
configuration. I have a few cases that I have researched, but it is
premature to show them at this point. I will choose as small a case as can
house the components. Keep in mind that an option I have is to take the
seat off. There are only 2 bolts and removal is not a problem. At this
point, I plan on leaving it on. Removal of the fork is absolutely out of
the question. I have a few neat ideas planned for the handlebar assembly.
This, my fork choice and a whole lot more in my next update. |